Some thoughts about AIG being "too big to fail"

Today, I learned an interesting fact about the AIG CDS situation. Apparently AIG has in excess of $400 billion in exposure to credit derivatives, much of which were sold to foreign as well as U.S. banks. The reason why banks like to purchase CDS’s is that this enables them to satisfy risk-based capital requirements associated with holding risky bonds (e.g., instruments like mortgage backed securities (MBS’s) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO’s)) in their asset portfolios. Therefore, AIG may in fact be big to fail because if it does, then this would likely unleash a financial contagion throughout the banking system which would substantially limit the availability of credit throughout the US economy.

Here’s a simple explanation of how financial contagion could occur if AIG were to fail. If AIG failed, then banks who relied up AIG’s contingent capital (in the form of CDS’s) would be required to raise cash in order to comply with risk-based regulatory capital requirements. Probably quite a few banks would not be successful in doing this on a timely basis, and would be forced to file for bankruptcy. In this scenario, surviving banks who managed to comply with regulatory capital requirements would naturally become quite reticent about lending. The net result would be a substantial credit shock for the overall real economy.

One final point; apparently the U.S. penchant for bailing out “too big to fail” financial institutions is going global. For example, lately the Bank of England is beginning to act much more “Fed-like” in terms of establishing contingent credit facilities for troubled financial institutions in the UK. Anyway, the real world is providing us with lots of risk management data and it will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

Prediction Markets Update (September 16, 2008)

Prediction markets continue to behave in a quite boring fashion. Once again, the changes in the 2008.PRES.McCAIN (down .2 at 51.5) and 2008.PRES.OBAMA (up .6 at 47.2) contract prices are rather marginal. It continues to appear, based upon my (somewhat arbitrary) cutoff price point of 55 for allocating Electoral College votes, that Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain are virtually tied (with 265 and 265 Electoral College votes respectively), with only Colorado (and its 9 Electoral College votes) “undecided”. However, New Hampshire is moving perilously close to re-entering the “undecided” category, since the last trade on NEWHAMPSHIRE.DEM was at 56.5 whereas the last trade on NEWHAMPSHIRE.REP was at 44.8

In keeping with my previous daily election blog entries, Nate Silver’s PECOTA model (see FiveThirtyEight) remains unchanged from yesterday, allocating 288 Electoral College votes to Mr. McCain and 250 electoral College votes to Mr. Obama.

AIG for Dummies

In a nutshell, here’s what I understand to be happening with American International Group (AIG):

1. AIG is a major player in the market for “Credit Default Swaps (CDS’s).

a. A CDS contract involves the transfer of the credit risk of municipal bonds, emerging market bonds, mortgage-backed securities, or corporate debt between two parties.

b. A CDS provides its buyer with protection against default, a credit rating downgrade, or some other negative “credit event” (e.g., being put on a credit watch list by a rating agency).

c. The CDS seller (in this case, AIG) assumes the credit risk that the buyer does not wish to bear in exchange for a periodic protection fee similar to an insurance premium, and is obligated to pay only if a negative credit event occurs. Essentially, AIG’s CDS business is a form of financial insurance.

2. What’s AIG’s “problem”?

a. As the “credit crunch” has continued to worsen, AIG’s CDS’s are declining in value and becoming increasingly less liquid. Consequently, regulatory and rating agency capital standards are essentially forcing AIG to collateralize these assets by raising more capital. However, it is very difficult (particularly for an already credit-impaired firm like AIG competing in an adverse financial market environment) to raise the capital needed on a timely basis in order to be able to comply with these standards.

b. To make matter even worse, a substantial share of AIG’s business involves exposure to commercial insurance products, whose buyers (primarily private and public sector risk managers) expect to place their business with high credit quality insurers. As AIG’s credit rating continues to decline, this substantially puts at risk AIG’s valuable commercial insurance franchise, which in turn makes it all the more difficult for AIG to raise capital.

It can be very tempting to criticize someone else’s actions when you have the benefit of hindsight. Having said that, the credit crisis does expose a fundamental flaw with AIG business model; specifically, it probably doesn’t make much sense to expose a business which has tremendous franchise value (i.e., AIG’s commercial insurance business) to an inordinate amount of credit risk. It is interesting to note that by and large, most firms in the financial guarantee business (e.g., companies like MBIA and AMBAC) are monoline companies; i.e., they market and distribute financial insurance products only.

Prediction Markets Update (September 15, 2008)

By comparison with real-world financial markets, prediction markets have lately grown quite boring. As was the case yesterday, the changes in the 2008.PRES.McCAIN Intrade contract (down .9 at 51.6) and 2008.PRES.OBAMA (up .4 at 47.2) Intrade contract are very marginal. There is also very little movement in the state-by-state contracts, so based upon my (somewhat arbitrary) cutoff price point of 55 for allocating Electoral College votes, it still appears that Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain are virtually tied (with 264 and 265 Electoral College votes respectively), with only Colorado (and its 9 Electoral College votes) “undecided”.

Similarly, Nate Silver’s PECOTA model (see FiveThirtyEight) shows little change from yesterday, allocating 280 (instead of 281) Electoral College votes to Mr. McCain and 259 (instead of 258) electoral College votes to Mr. Obama.

Observations concerning some of today's events in the worlds of finance, insurance, and risk management

1. Lehman Brothers and AIG: As John Markman cleverly notes, “…the Federal Reserve stood up to the big Wall Street financial houses on Sunday and essentially told them, ‘thanks but no thanks’ on their request for a bridge loan to nowhere”. Consequently, Lehman Brothers (the 4th largest investment bank in the world) has filed for bankruptcy protection, and its shares are trading today for 23 cents per share. Bill Gross made an interesting comment concerning Lehman and American International Group (AIG) this morning on CNBC; he noted that while AIG is technically solvent, it is highly illiquid, whereas Lehman is technically insolvent but otherwise quite liquid. Just one year ago, AIG had a market capitalization of nearly $200 billion, making it one of America’s most valuable publicly traded corporations. Today, AIG’s market capitalization stands at $18 billion. The problem AIG faces is that if this company can’t resolve its liquidity problems really soon (like sometime within the next couple of days), then it risks being downgraded by the credit rating agencies. If AIG’s credit rating becomes impaired, it stands to lose a substantial share of its client base. AIG is particularly heavily exposed to commercial insurance lines of business, and their clients have no interest in doing business with credit-impaired insurers. If this scenario plays out, expect to see AIG follow up with its own bankruptcy filing.

 
2. Hurricane Ike: The three major catastrophe risk modeling firms (Applied Insurance Research (AIR), EQECAT, and Risk Management Solutions (RMS)) project insured losses of between $6 – $18 billion, primarily in the Texas counties of Brazoria, Harris, Galveston, Chambers and Jefferson. Since the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) is heavily exposed to insured properties in these counties, I suspect that claims may very likely exceed TWIA’s capital base of $1.87 billion, which consists $370 million in a Catastrophe Reserve Trust Fund and $1.5 billion in reinsurance. Depending upon the magnitude of TWIA’s Ike-related losses, private insurers in Texas could face assessments which would have the potential for setting in motion a financially vicious cycle in which future earnings and capitalization are impaired, which in turn adversely affect insurer credit ratings. Matters can only get worse if the Texas gulf coast gets hit with any more hurricanes any time soon.
 
3. Oil Speculation: Apparently so-called “oil speculators” were not behind the large run-up in oil prices during the first half of 2008, any more than they were behind the subsequent retreat in oil prices during the past couple of months. Last week, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a report which provides compelling empirical evidence to the effect that financial trading hasn’t been driving price moves in oil markets after all. For a synopsis of this study, see the article from today’s Wall Street Journal entitled “See You Later, Speculator”. As I noted in my July 10, 2008 blog entry entitled “Rebuttal of ‘An open letter to all airline customers‘”, this finding comes as no surprise. Thankfully American Airlines has finally gotten around to removing the link from its home page urging consumers to “stop oil speculators by sending Congress an S.O.S.”…
]]>